William Akoto, State-sponsored cyber conflict: How Russia responds to election interference allegations on social media
Russia has repeatedly faced allegations of interfering in US elections through cyber and information operations. While the existence of these operations is well-documented, little is known about how Russian state-sponsored cyber proxies strategically counter these accusations on social media.
In a new article in Contemporary Security Policy, SIS Professor William Akoto analyzes 3,424 tweets from 287 Russian proxy accounts identified by X (formerly Twitter), focusing on their responses to election interference claims between 2010 and 2020. Using topic modeling, cluster analysis, and rhetorical analysis, he uncovers sophisticated tactics employed by these proxies, including narrative control, strategic retweeting, and reactive engagement, designed to amplify doubt, discredit accusers, and deepen social divisions.
Akoto's findings highlight the nuanced ways in which state-sponsored proxies leverage social media dynamics to manipulate public perceptions. The study informs contemporary policy debates around misinformation and platform governance, providing valuable insights for safeguarding democratic processes against state-backed disinformation campaigns.
Read the article here.